HISTORY OF ART AND SOCIAL PRACTICE This course will trace a history of social practice in art and investigate as a group the current critiques, debates and issues surrounding its current state in relation to its historical context. The course will examine social practice from 1920 to present and touch on the key movements and artists including Dada, Neo-Concretism, Situationism, Fluxus, Happenings, Social Sculpture, New Genre Public Art, art and activism, network art, Social Aesthetics, post-studio practices, and Relational Aesthetics. This course will place a strong emphasis on contemporary examples of social practice art and the themes of making things, making things better, making things worse, as connected to the Open Engagement conference. Students will have a direct dialogue to the international conference on Art and Social Practice that will take place at PSU from May 14-17. The students in this class will generate writing that will comprise the conference catalogue, and have direct contact with the artists coming to the conference. Through group activities, discussions, student led seminars and participatory projects the class will work together to address the some of following questions, can socially engaged art do more harm than good? Are there ethical responsibilities for social art? Does socially engaged art have to do civic or public good? Can there be transdisciplinary approaches to contemporary art making that would contribute to issues such as urban planning and sustainability? As both urban planning and contemporary art imagine new worlds, how can art projects be seen as potential models for living?

Shotgun Review-Floating Forests by Chloé Womack

Monday, May 17th Bruce Conkle gave his presentation on “Floating Forests” during the Open Engagement parallel sessions. Conkle covered the history of large oil tankers, lead the group through slides that accentuated the enormous size of these ships, and their resulting decline for practical/ economic reasons. These massive ships used to carry oil from ocean to ocean are now one by one being torn apart and scrapped for  steel via a process called “Ship Breaking”.  

“Ship Breaking” is a hazardous, inhumane process that predominantly takes place in India and Pakistan. Conkle’s discussion was aimed at brainstorming ways to utilize retired oil tankers as agricultural sites that could migrate with climate change. 

Conkle left the floor open for the attendees to theorize how to make a project like Floating Forests work.  It became a dialogue about sustainability, practicality, and logistics. How would you protect the Floating Forests from ocean weather? How would one get fresh water to irrigate the crops and orchards? Can an oil tanker be powered by the wind? 

Conkle acknowledged that he knew little about how an artist would go about a project the size of Floating Forests and inspired all in attendance to interpret the concept themselves and run with it. 

Tuesday 5/25/2010

(4 notes)

  1. metamennonite reblogged this from historyofartandsocialpractice
  2. historyofartandsocialpractice posted this