HISTORY OF ART AND SOCIAL PRACTICE This course will trace a history of social practice in art and investigate as a group the current critiques, debates and issues surrounding its current state in relation to its historical context. The course will examine social practice from 1920 to present and touch on the key movements and artists including Dada, Neo-Concretism, Situationism, Fluxus, Happenings, Social Sculpture, New Genre Public Art, art and activism, network art, Social Aesthetics, post-studio practices, and Relational Aesthetics. This course will place a strong emphasis on contemporary examples of social practice art and the themes of making things, making things better, making things worse, as connected to the Open Engagement conference. Students will have a direct dialogue to the international conference on Art and Social Practice that will take place at PSU from May 14-17. The students in this class will generate writing that will comprise the conference catalogue, and have direct contact with the artists coming to the conference. Through group activities, discussions, student led seminars and participatory projects the class will work together to address the some of following questions, can socially engaged art do more harm than good? Are there ethical responsibilities for social art? Does socially engaged art have to do civic or public good? Can there be transdisciplinary approaches to contemporary art making that would contribute to issues such as urban planning and sustainability? As both urban planning and contemporary art imagine new worlds, how can art projects be seen as potential models for living?

If It Ain’t Broke- Their Place in Social Practice Canon

By Josh Mong
   
Sara Black and John Preus consistently use two basic hallmarks of social practice in their work as If It Ain’t Broke.   These are the dialogical process and the collaborative process.  Not only do these elements manifest simply between Black and Preus as artists, but also with their audience/participants in the execution or creation of their work.  The pair engages in a discussion with the owners of “broken things”, over the thing, the condition of brokenness, the meaning of the thing, the possibility of repair, creative solutions, abandonment, and the general meaning of the process.  The confluence of these ideas as well as the final execution of the plan blurs between the dialogical and the collaborative.

The work also shows influence of Derrida’s Deconstructivism, often quite literally as well as philosophically.  The spirit of Situationists public engagement is also evident, although to knowledge the pair usually operate in a specific space, often associated with performance or gallery.  If It Ain’t Broke often times, though not in their recent Open Engagement manifestation, contains a raw earthy aesthetic by the reliance of old reclaimed lumber and materials.  In this sense they are reminiscent of some of Joseph Beuys’ object based work.  In their explorations of brokenness they also give a nod to Mierle Laderman Ukeles pioneering work with notions of sanitation and refuse.

Tuesday 5/25/2010

(4 notes)

  1. historyofartandsocialpractice posted this